Abstract:
In this blog, I share my journey connecting the strategic realms of chess, mathematics, and scientific research. Growing up in Cartagena, Spain, and now pursuing a Double Degree in Mathematics and Physics, I discovered that both chess and math thrive on logic, creativity, and problem-solving. My work modelling the transmission of Strep A in Indigenous communities has taught me that every calculated move—whether on a chessboard or in a research model—can turn challenges into opportunities. I will now explain how strategy and passion shape my path.
Body:
To me, chess is much more than a simple pastime: it is a game of puzzles and prediction. Chess trained my mind at an early age to embrace complexity, hone my creativity, and train my skills in persistent problem-solving. Each chess piece, like every term in an equation, holds a unique position, contributing to the overall strategy. This realization sparked a passion that has guided both my academic pursuits and my research endeavors.
Studying at Complutense University of Madrid—and later during my exchange semester at La Trobe University—I delved into advanced mathematical theories and sharpened my skills as a competitive chess player. The strategies I honed on the chessboard, where evaluating a position might be as simple as “evaluation = material + position + initiative,” proved invaluable when I faced challenges in my research.
Working with Dr. Rebecca Chisholm to study a model-based approach for estimating Group A Streptococcus (Strep A) transmission pathway parameters in Indigenous communities has been one of the most transformative experiences in my academic career. In these projects, I applied methods like agent-based modeling and Bayesian inference, navigating complex networks of infection spread. Much like anticipating an opponent’s moves in chess, my research demanded a careful analysis of patterns and probabilities.
Each decision—whether simulating a transmission pathway or planning to move the bishop to c4 or b5—required balancing risk and reward, sharpening my strategic foresight in two distinct yet parallel disciplines. In chess, a single mistake can cost a game, just as a miscalculation in a research model can lead to inaccurate conclusions. Yet, both realms reward constantly improving your methods and being persistent towards seeking the best possible outcome. After each lost match or research setback, I would review my approach, learn from my mistakes, and strategize anew. This iterative process has deepened my appreciation for the beauty of structure and the elegance of problem-solving under pressure.
By embracing the interconnected worlds of chess, mathematics, and scientific research, I have discovered that creativity flourishes within constraints. Whether calculating a tricky integral or deciphering the dynamics of disease transmission, I remain inspired by the endless possibilities that emerge when logical thinking meets passion. This blend of strategy and discovery continues to shape my journey, reminding me that every move—on the board or in the lab—is an opportunity to learn, adapt, and triumph.
Aaron Alonso Garcia
La Trobe University
